15 April 2013


IMAGINE: Fictional Architecture And The 
Liberation of Ideas
07th April - 30th June 2013, Bin Matar House, Bahrain




As part of the annual spring festival of culture in Bahrain, the Shaikh Ebrahim Centre presents “IMAGINE: Fictional Architecture And The Liberation of Ideas” an exhibition of experimental architectural drawings. With this show the centre continues its series of exhibitions focusing on the world of architecture and design which started with the 2010 exhibition of Zaha Hadid’s design objects and paintings in Bin Matar House - the first in the Gulf region.

Unit Sixteen and former DS 14 has a considerable presence in this year’s exhibition, focusing for the first time on architectural drawings. 

"In these projects of final year graduate students at some of Europe’s leading architectural schools, these drawings and three dimensional objects find there greatest sense of personal expression and liberty to explore fictional domains. Prior to entering the world of real architecture, where illustrative and technical drawings dominate, architecture students are free to create utopian and imaginary projects." Melissa Enders-Bhatia Head of Art and Exhibitions at the Shikh Ebrahim bin Mohammed Al Khalifa Centre for Culture and Research, Bahrain

Those exhibited include . . .

Meor Haris Bahrin , Luke Chandresinghe, Michael Dean, Adis Dobardzic
Mark Hatter, Sun Hwang, Jinhyuk  Ko, Gill Lambert, Christopher Leung
Jorg Majer, Tania Okpa, Pernilla Ohrstedt, Yumi Saito, Matthew Wilkinson
Nick Szczepaniak


The exhibition was designed and curated by Elke Frotscher and Florian Frotscher work exhibited was from The Bartlett, University of Greenwich, Oxford Brookes and University of Westminster graduates.



Extract from the Catalogue essay by Simon Herron & Susanne Isa . . . 

On Drawing:
Drawing is a skill traditionally that all architects have to acquire to communicate with a client, engineer and builder. Drawings made for a client are to enable them to appreciate and understand how the architect intends to manifest in built form their needs and aspirations, in response to a particular brief and budget on a given site. Drawings produced for the builder enable them to understand in technical terms how the built form is to be achieved and to what technical standard and finish. There is a long history to the making of these kinds of marks on paper for conveying this type of information through to the whole building information modelling of BIM.

The drawings presented within this exhibition have a different reader in mind. Less understood these drawings are essentially private. The imagined reader is the author along with other architects and critics alike. Raw, incredibly personal, these works are not pictured or imagined illustrations of fully formed ideas or projects. They are the first speculative glimpses, driven by a complex machine code of cyphers, a private haptic language of invention, raw fundamental data sets, laying bare, the scripted genetic code of the author.

Drawings are considered simultaneously as both tools of practice and as sites of construction. Tactile, independent surfaces to be assembled with consideration to their particular processes of manufacture, their spatial geometries and syntax, a combination of actual and implied scales, the playful interplay of unexpected material relationships.

Drawings imagined within this active real-time speculative space, work as filters, collating and testing unexpected relationships. Considers possibilities of dynamic motion, part hard conditioned facts, framed against half-truths and myths. The building site is part paper, part transferred references, an elaborate interwoven fluid field shifting through time and space.

Drawings should contain a combination of architectural and non-architectural scales. Drawings are framed as hybrids, x% fact, x% fiction, with the precise alchemical ratio to be determined by the author. These constructions are physical entities, with a corresponding mass with measurable densities. They are transformative, evolving surfaces in flux, containing the traces and histories of their manufacturer.

Marcel Duchamp in 1917, proposed that by simply choosing an Ordinary
Article Of Life [Urinal], Displacing its Context [hardware store to art gallery] so that its usual significance and meaning disappears, then by creating a New Title [Fountain] and Point Of View [Art], created New Thoughts and New Meaning, a powerful transformative tool. The application too architecture

Subject + Object  + Space:
Through this critical re- examination, re-appraisal, New Thoughts are created for both architectural objects and spaces. Displacement further removes an object from its familiar context, destabilizing its meaning and function. With this, there needs to be an adjustment of the prospective positions of both reader and narrator.

Transformations may be imperceptible or dramatic.
Transformations may be merely implied, suggested or imagined.
Something impermanent could be in a constant state of flux.
Discarded discredited or simply retired technologies or ideologies.
To be out of date is to be dislocated in time and space

Whilst reading these drawings consider these thoughts: Something local, as seen on TV, something at a junction, popular, transient , expendable, cheap, mass produced, audacious, witty, gimmicky, romantic, leftovers, loose ends, the invisible, customised, luxury, plastic, abandoned, incomplete, unmade, misunderstood, inefficient, broken, forgotten, misplaced, bespoke, out of place, matter of fact . . . . .

Consider the structure the composition, cropped and close up, the stylization of image. You may choose to physically cut and edit them. Or you may choose to manipulate the images digitally. Consider trying a combination of physical cutting and digital manipulation. 



Fieldworks:
We have traversed the unfolding backlands of America, reframed against the unfolding landscapes of post-industrial England, in the shadow of Empire. This is not a Gateway [2010-11] explored the consequences of the failure of an over dominant industry on its host city. Detroit Michigan, motor city USA was taken as a model, a city with a self inflicted dependency culture running deep into the zeitgeist of its past and future. London's own dependency on an over extended service sector was pictured against imagined banking failures, mass civil unrest, leading to unprecedented urban flight, abandoned London falls into protracted decline. Nostalgia for the future [2011-12] explored the emerging territories of Stratford City and the Westfield center, proposing alternative Olympic legacies, a fresh new world of dreams.

Returning to the heart of the metropolis this year, to focus on the boundaries between wealth and power at the center of the Common-Wealth. Trafalgar Square the centre of study. Conceived originally as a public space by John Nash, Sir Charles Barry, most recently re-modeled by Sir Norman Foster. A complex paradoxical landscape, surrounded by the symbols of lost tribes, failed ideologies and faded power. Restoration [2012-13] - is a collective call to challenge, to re see the utility and function of the institutions of state, rejecting traditions, proposing new futures.


No comments:

Post a Comment